Travel Weekly columnist Steve Endacott urges the government to allow airlines and travel companies to make it compulsory for customers to defer holidays until the coronavirus crisis has subsided.
In times of crisis, people often ask: “What can the government do to save jobs?”
In the current coronavirus crisis, that is set to decimate the holiday industry, the answer in my opinion is simple.
Allow airlines and travel companies to make it compulsory for customers to defer holidays until the coronavirus has receded and normal travel can be resumed.
This clause will only apply if FCO advice is not to travel to a county for a period and airlines are forced to stop flying, just as Jet2 has done to Spain today.
Unfortunately, we live in a “selfish world” and consumers, left to their own devices, will demand full refunds under the package travel regulations or process recharges via credit card companies, under non-delivery of products rules. Who can blame them, if these are the rules that apply?
However, the impact of this will send many travel companies and airlines bankrupt.
Airlines such as British Airways are already going to suffer massive losses, due to having to ground aircraft and the difficulty in scaling back staff numbers fast enough.
The bigger you are in a crisis, the more likely you are to go bust, so please don’t believe having a major brand is any form of safeguard.
Having to refund the millions of customers who have booked but cannot travel for a period that could amount to months, will simply send airlines and travel companies bust.
The only solution, therefore, is for the government to change regulations, to permit airlines and travel companies to mandatorily defer flight and holidays. They can then tell customers that they have to choose new dates for their holidays either next year, which is the safest solution or for later in the year.
The customer would still get the holiday they booked and paid for but just a later date.
Obviously, companies would have to waive all amendment fees and take the administrative burden of rebooking at no cost, but I can guarantee that every travel company I know would agree to this.
The alternative is wholesale collapses and an Atol fund that has been so depleted by the Thomas Cook collapse that it could not cope, forcing further government funding.
Some customers may not be happy with this deal, but most would accept it as being fair and reasonable in these exception circumstances, if it saves jobs and keeps airlines alive, as the alternative is few players and much higher flight/holiday prices when we come out of the other side of the pandemic.
In a crisis, cash is king and, sorry customers, but we need to retain your cash for a while in order to survive.
This is a community-moderated forum.
All post are the individual views of the respective commenter and are not the expressed views of Travel Weekly.
By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms & Conditions.